Implications of SAM for Instructional Design
SAM offers a more flexible, dynamic approach to course development compared to traditional linear models like ADDIE. It recognizes that learning needs and project requirements often evolve during the design process. In SAM, getting early feedback reduces the risk of spending too much time building a product that misses the mark. It also strengthens collaboration and helps ensure that the final product is truly aligned with learner needs.
Strengths
- Promotes early feedback and faster problem-solving
- Encourages stakeholder collaboration throughout the process
- Reduces risk of costly mistakes or major rework
- Supports creativity and responsiveness to change
- Builds a stronger product-user fit through rapid iteration
Limitations
- Requires more frequent access to SMEs, reviewers, or users
- Can feel chaotic without strong project management
- Risk of scope creep if changes are not well-managed
- May be harder to document for highly formal or regulated environments
SAM in My Minicourse
SAM would be a strong fit for my minicourse because property managers value practical, immediately usable tools. Using SAM, I could build quick prototypes of templates, inspection checklists, or sample walkthrough videos and gather early feedback from actual property managers. This feedback could be collected through short surveys, informal interviews, or pilot testing select course elements with a small group of peers. These touchpoints would allow me to refine materials quickly and ensure they’re truly aligned with learners’ needs. A possible challenge would be coordinating consistent feedback given property managers’ busy schedules, but by keeping prototypes small and targeted (for example, testing just a single checklist or short module at a time), I could still benefit from SAM’s iterative structure without overwhelming learners or stakeholders.